IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/120195.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

County Wildfire Risk Ratings in Northern California: FAIR Plan Insurance Policies and Simulation Models vs. Red Flag Warnings and Diablo Winds

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, James

Abstract

Because of increasing wildfire risk and associated losses, fire insurance has become more difficult to obtain in Northern California. The only insurance alternative for homeowners who are unable to find conventional home insurance is limited and costly coverage available through the California FAIR Plan. Counties located in the Central Sierras have been particularly hard hit with insurance cancellations. FAIR Plan policies in several of those counties exceeded 20% of all policies in 2021. Results from three recent assessments, based on wildfire simulation models, agree that counties in the Central Sierras are among the most at-risk for wildfire-caused structure loss. Most housing losses in the 2013-2022 decade, however, were the result of wind-driven fires in the Northern Sierras and in the Northern San Francisco Bay Area. 85% of all losses occurred in fires where a Red Flag Warning (RFW) for high winds had been issued by the National Weather Service. The Northern Sierras and the North Bay Area averaged 60% more RFW days during the fall fire season compared to the Central Sierras. Strong downslope “Diablo” winds from the Great Basin deserts were involved in seven of the most destructive fires, accounting for 65% of the total housing losses. Based on records from 109 weather stations throughout the Sierras and the Bay Area, these wind events occur primarily in the Northern Sierras and the Bay Area. Climate models have predicted that Diablo-type winds should decrease as the interior deserts warm, but weather stations in both the Bay Area and the Sierras recorded a large increase in the number of strong DiabIo wind days in the 2017 through 2021 years. All seven of the Diablo wind fires occurred during that time span. Fires driven by strong Diablo winds fit into a category of disasters referred to as “black swan” events – rare occurrences that have very large effects. Because these fires occur so infrequently, they have minimal effect on risk estimates produced by averaging together the outcomes of thousands of simulations. Exceedance probability analysis (Ager et al., 2021) can help to identify the communities most at risk from such high-loss, low-probability events. Combining exceedance probability analysis with simulation models that capture the frequency and location of extreme wind events should cause county risk rankings to more closely match actual losses. As a result, the relative risk ratings (and FAIR Plan policies) assigned to the Central Sierras should be reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, James, 2024. "County Wildfire Risk Ratings in Northern California: FAIR Plan Insurance Policies and Simulation Models vs. Red Flag Warnings and Diablo Winds," MPRA Paper 120195, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/120195/1/MPRA_paper_120195.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schmidt, James, 2023. "Defensible Space, Housing Density, and Diablo-North Wind Events: Impacts on Loss Rates for Homes in Northern California Wildfires," MPRA Paper 116166, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Wildfire; Fire Insurance; FAIR Plan; Diablo Wind; Red Flag Warnings; Exceedance Probability; Black Swan; Simulation; FSIM; ELMFIRE; Exposure; Ignition Density; Risk; California; Downslope Winds; Climate models; RAWS; weather stations; Wildland Urban Interface; WUI; Camp Fire; Tubbs Fire; Central Sierras; San Francisco Bay Area; Northern Sierras;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
      • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
      • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
      • Y1 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Data: Tables and Charts
      • Y91 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Other - - - Pictures and Maps

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.