IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/117528.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What are the contributions of the Euthanasia Debate to Management: a discussion of the ethical dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Andrade, Alequexandre Galvez de
  • Martimiano, Daniela Alessandra Landi
  • Rodrigues, Rodrigo Favoreto

Abstract

The aim of this work was to characterize euthanasia from an ethical perspective and to build meanings for management, through the comparison of research and its relations with the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. Nine articles were selected with the construct "euthanasia" to identify the current discussions on the theme that demonstrates its multidisciplinary character. To achieve the proposed objective, the content analysis was performed that separated the theme into five clusters, relating the frequency and significance. The results indicate that euthanasia is related to autonomy, freedom, dignity, the right to life and social problems that can induce death without due reflection, the same is the case with organizations. These rights would be protected by medical ethics that has no global conformity, mainly by the moderating effect that deals with social issues, in the management individual decisions tend to contain misunderstandings so collegiate decisions maintain more coherence with the institutional purpose, respecting different cultures.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrade, Alequexandre Galvez de & Martimiano, Daniela Alessandra Landi & Rodrigues, Rodrigo Favoreto, 2020. "What are the contributions of the Euthanasia Debate to Management: a discussion of the ethical dilemma," MPRA Paper 117528, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2020.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:117528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117528/1/Artigo4_Euthanasia%20Debate.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Euthanasia; Nuremberg Code; Declaration of Helsinki.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:117528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.