IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/112363.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Инициатива За Корпоративна Прозрачност. Аналитичен Доклад България 2021
[Corporate Transpаrеncy. Analytical report Bulgaria 2021]

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanova, Marina
  • Petrova, Vesela
  • Atanasov, Atanas
  • Nikolov, Emil
  • Nikol, Olya
  • Kambourova, Bilyana

Abstract

BG:По подобие на финансовото счетоводство, данните за устойчивостта се превръщат в незаменим източник на информация за ефективното корпоративно управление на рисковете и възможностите пред развитието и успеха в бизнеса. Потребителите, инвеститорите и банките също започват да търсят такива данни, за да оценят стратегията и дългосрочната жизнеспособност на компаниите при вземането на инвестиционни решения. В тези компании правителствата разпознават партньор при изпълнение на ангажиментите си към Парижкото споразумение и Глобалните цели на ООН за устойчиво развитие. Различни проучвания обаче показват, че съществуващото отчитане не е съвместимо с тези цели и че липсата на интеграция с финансовите отчети означава, че предоставяната информация не е достатъчна за вземане на бизнес решения. Настоящото изследване е структурирано така, че да разкрие степента, в която задължените предприятия оповестяват пред широката общественост и потенциалните инвеститори информация за следните анализирани категории: бизнес модел, екологични и социални аспекти на своята дейност, политиките и практиките им по отношение правата на човека и борба с корупцията. Дългосрочната му цел е да допринесе за по-добрата информираност относно ролята на компаниите при създаване на добавена стойност както на пазара, така и за обществото като цяло. EN: Like financial accounting, sustainability data is becoming an indispensable source of information for effective corporate risk management and business development and success opportunities. Consumers, investors and banks are also beginning to look for such data to assess companies' strategy and long-term viability in making investment decisions. In these companies, governments recognize a partner in fulfilling their commitments to the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Global Goals for Sustainable Development. However, various studies show that existing reporting is not compatible with these objectives and that the lack of integration with financial statements means that the information provided is not sufficient for business decisions. This study is structured to reveal the extent to which obligated companies disclose to the general public and potential investors information on the following analyzed categories: business model, environmental and social aspects of their activities, their human rights policies and practices and the fight against with corruption. Its long-term goal is to contribute to better awareness of the role of companies in creating added value both in the market and for society as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanova, Marina & Petrova, Vesela & Atanasov, Atanas & Nikolov, Emil & Nikol, Olya & Kambourova, Bilyana, 2021. "Инициатива За Корпоративна Прозрачност. Аналитичен Доклад България 2021 [Corporate Transpаrеncy. Analytical report Bulgaria 2021]," MPRA Paper 112363, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:112363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/112363/1/MPRA_paper_112363.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    non-financial reporting; Bulgaria; transparency; ESG; Directive 2014/95/EC;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:112363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.