IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/102852.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quince años de conflicto Monitor vs Radio Centro
[Fifteen years of conflict Monitor vs Radio Centro]

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Antonio, Villalobos Lopez

Abstract

On May 7, 2002, there was a legal dispute between Infored and Grupo Radio Centro, arising from a contract they concluded four years earlier, a dispute that leads to arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce. The arbitral tribunal issued its final award, declaring the termination of the contract and ordering Grupo Radio Centro to pay $21 million to Infored. The arbitration clause of the contract would result in a fierce struggle of legal and judicial battles between these two radio groups, for more than fifteen years. Once the arbitral award is lost, Grupo Radio Centro does not recognize it and claims that the arbitrators did not prove to be experts in the matter, even with the arbitrator themselves that they chose and proposed for arbitration. Gutierrez Vivó, together with analysts and journalists imply that the former was very uncomfortable for the rulers of that time, who seek and manage to block it economically, through pressure not to buy advertising where he broadcast their radio programs. Gutierrez Vivó expresses that the public characters who harassed and pressured him would be: Vicente Fox and Martha Sahagún in the first instance. Upon taking office, Felipe Calderón, Maximiliano Cortázar, Head of Social Communication of the Presidency, Javier Lozano Alarcón, Secretary of Labour, Ricardo Acedo, Secretary of the Radio and Television Industry Union (STIRT), Jaime Daniel Cervantes Martínez, Judge 63rd of the Civil in the Federal District and Eduardo Henkel, Consul of Singapore. Desperate Gutierrez Vivo for the tactics and legal remedies he used and that allowed the members of the Judiciary to Grupo Radio Centro, in 2008 he made the decision to sue For moral damages and damages to Grupo Radio Centro and the members of the Aguirre Gómez family, the owners of the broadcaster. Decision you would surely regret for a long time. The lawsuit for moral damage is lost by Infored-Gutiérrez Vivó and sentenced to pay more than 757 million pesos, for court costs in 2013. For more than four years it sought protection and technical resources to combat this legal claim, but finally on November 10, 2017, the First Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation dismissed its review appeal as inappropriate and unfounded, with unanimous decision of ministers. This terminates his pilgrimage and torment in courts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Antonio, Villalobos Lopez, 2020. "Quince años de conflicto Monitor vs Radio Centro [Fifteen years of conflict Monitor vs Radio Centro]," MPRA Paper 102852, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Sep 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:102852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/102852/1/MPRA_paper_102852.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Villalobos López, José Antonio, 2021. "Radio Programas de México a 100 años de radio en México [Radio Programs from Mexico to 100 years of radio in Mexico]," MPRA Paper 105408, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Monitor; Infored; Monitor vs Radio Centro;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:102852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.