IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ppi/ppicwp/2004.02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the School-to-Work Opportunities Act in California

Author

Listed:
  • David Neumark

Abstract

Extensive interviews with school-to-career (STC) practitioners in California are used to study the effectiveness of the STC system created in California by the School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994. The interviews also aimed to obtain a clearer understanding of how STC practitioners gauge the success of their programs and more generally to examine the potential for evaluation of program effectiveness. The interviews lead to three main findings. First, although most providers believe that their efforts have been successful, relatively few define success in terms of post-secondary experiences of the students they serve. Second, only a minority of STC Local Partnerships even collect data on non-participants and only a handful collect data on post-secondary outcomes. Finally, local evaluations provide little if any convincing evidence of the effectiveness of STC programs, especially as regards post-secondary outcomes; this does not reflect a good deal of careful evaluation that fails to establish effects of STC, but rather a dearth of adequate evaluation. The findings strongly suggest that STC funding needs to be linked to mandates and support for effective evaluation of STC activities.

Suggested Citation

  • David Neumark, 2004. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the School-to-Work Opportunities Act in California," PPIC Working Papers 2004.02, Public Policy Institute of California.
  • Handle: RePEc:ppi:ppicwp:2004.02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ppi:ppicwp:2004.02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ppiccus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.