IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phs/dpaper/198104.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Asian Urbanization and Development : A Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ernesto M. Pernia

    (School of Economics, University of the Philippines Diliman)

Abstract

A comparative perspective on Asian urbanization and development is offered in this paper. In this first part, some aspects of urbanization and spatial concentration are discussed using data on South, Southeast, East and Centrally Planned Asian countries. South and Southeast (and some extent Centrally Planned) Asian countries have been experiencing slow urbanization but rapid urban and rural population growth; the reverse is true for East Asian countries. In the second part, an expanded urbanization-development model is proposed and then tested empirically. The results show that, in addition to manufacturing and agricultural growth, population growth plays a crucial role but this is to slow down the urbanization process. Agricultural development also appears to retard urbanization, perhaps because it allows for absorption of labor, lending further support to the notion that rural development can reduce unwarranted migration to cities. Another noteworthy finding is that openness of the economy, besides manufacturing activity, is a significant determinant of concentration in the metropolis. Apparently, concentration is a response to the need to be near the principal port as well as to offices that issue import licenses and foreign exchange, among other things. Thus, spatial concentration seems to be partly an unintended consequence of economic policies, salient among which was the import-substitution industrialization strategy in the past.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernesto M. Pernia, 1981. "Asian Urbanization and Development : A Comparative Analysis," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 198104, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:198104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:198104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RT Campos (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seupdph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.