IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2020-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Looking at Local Government Resilience through Network Data Envelopment Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Domingo, Sonny N.
  • Manejar, Arvie Joy A.

Abstract

The study looks into the disaster risk resilience of provincial governments in the Philippines using World Bank (WB) socioeconomic resiliency estimates and cross-sectional data generated by the Department of Interior and Local Government and the Philippine Statistics Authority. Treating provincial governments as decisionmaking units (DMUs) with bureaucratic sub-units at the provincial and city/municipal levels, composite efficiency scores were generated using an integrated Data Envelopment Approach. A WB-generated socioeconomic resiliency scorecard at the provincial level provided comparative output references for the model. Results show that disaster risk reduction and management inputs at the provincial and sub-province levels greatly contribute to improving socioeconomic capacity and decreasing asset risk. However, DMU efficiency scores varied across the different sub-regional domains. A majority of provincial subDMUs also got higher efficiency ratings compared to their municipal/community subDMU counterparts, implying the need to rebalance support and disaster resilience -related initiatives at the sub-provincial levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Domingo, Sonny N. & Manejar, Arvie Joy A., 2020. "Looking at Local Government Resilience through Network Data Envelopment Analysis," Discussion Papers DP 2020-19, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2020-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/looking-at-local-government-resilience-through-network-data-envelopment-analysis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Disaster Risk Reduction and Management; Disaster Resiliency; Data Envelopment Analysis; provincial government;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2020-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.