IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2018-44_(revised).html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact Evaluation Design for the CHED K-to-12 Transition Program

Author

Listed:
  • Orbeta, Aniceto Jr. C.
  • Cabalfin, Michael R.
  • Mallari, Brian C.

Abstract

This paper describes an impact evaluation design for the CHED K to 12 Transition Program. It focuses on two of the biggest components of the program, namely, (a) the scholarships for graduate studies, and (b) the institutional development and innovation grants. The scholarships for graduate studies aim to enhance the knowledge and skills of higher education institution personnel and improve the quality of teaching in higher education. Given the limited coverage of the program, the selection of participants based on certain criteria summarized into a score that can be ranked and the supposed cut-off score, and the phasing of program implementation, the most appropriate evaluation strategy is regression discontinuity design. The Institutional Development and Innovation Grant, on the other hand, aims to enhance the quality of higher education institutions, among other things, by helping them improve their accreditation level, acquire centers of development and excellence status, autonomous and deregulated status, and in their quest for global competitiveness. Given similar considerations, the proposed evaluation method is also the regression discontinuity design. The paper also describes the next steps in implementing the impact evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Orbeta, Aniceto Jr. C. & Cabalfin, Michael R. & Mallari, Brian C., 2018. "Impact Evaluation Design for the CHED K-to-12 Transition Program," Discussion Papers DP 2018-44 (Revised), Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2018-44_(revised)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/impact-evaluation-design-for-the-ched-k-to-12-transition-program
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2018-44_(revised). See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.