IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2016-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact Assessment of the National Greening Program of the DENR: Scoping or Process Evaluation Phase - Institutional Component

Author

Listed:
  • Luna, Maria Paz G.

Abstract

The National Greening Program (NGP) comes after a dip in the country's forest cover and a decade after a large reforestation program was judged to be unsustainable. Large-scale reforestation globally has met with limited success but as a jump-start mechanism that carpet bombed large denuded areas with reforestation effort, the NGP seems to have succeeded in at least two of its measured metrics. As a bonus, the uniformity and strict monitoring of the program, both in survival rates and financial flows, can be used to clean up the Department of Environment and Natural Resources bureaucracy if complaints can be acted on swiftly, and results are communicated to complainants. To ensure efficiency and sustainability, a succeeding program would need to diversify methods based on scale, existing forest cover, and implementer's motivations; use strategic policy interventions and targeted protection measures; and be implemented by an organization with a clear reforestation and forest production mandate and with skills for dispute resolution, organizing, and efficient technology transfer. Digital media would also have to be taken advantage of for mapping, public buy-in, crowd-sourced strategies, and methods and transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Luna, Maria Paz G., 2016. "Impact Assessment of the National Greening Program of the DENR: Scoping or Process Evaluation Phase - Institutional Component," Discussion Papers DP 2016-29, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2016-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/impact-assessment-of-the-national-greening-program-of-the-denr-scoping-or-process-evaluation-phase-institutional-component
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Philippines; National Greening Program (NGP); reforestation; forestry law enforcement; tree planting; geotagging trees; forestry agency;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2016-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.