IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pec/wpaper/2021_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring structural resilience of economies: Globalization or deglobalization?

Author

Listed:
  • Tibor Kiss

    (UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS-FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS)

  • Tamás Sebestyén

    (UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS-FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS)

  • Erik Braun

    (UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS-FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS)

Abstract

The discussion about the role and effects of international trade has begun to inten- sify recently. On the one hand, we know that specialization and participation in the international division of labor results in more efficient production structures that bring welfare gains. On the other hand, the resulting strong interconnectedness of countries allows for rapid spread of shocks and a more volatile and vulnerable system. Overall, neither full self-sufficiency nor an extremely globalized produc- tion structure seems to be sustainable nowadays. However, the responsiveness of countries to shocks might depend on the resilience of the countries. A system’s (economy’s) level of resilience derives from two structural properties: redundancy and efficiency. An efficient system has only a few mutual relationships, which indicates strong specialized trade flows and corresponds to highly globalized pro- duction processes of a country. In contrast, a redundant system has many more similarly weak connections signaling a less specialized and embedded position of elements within the system, corresponding to a lower level of involvement within the international division of labor. While it is clear that extreme efficiency and ex- treme redundancy are not optimal arrangements, finding the optimal combination in between is challenging. Putting this framework of system resilience into interna- tional trade and production networks, may indicate the optimal trade-off between self-sufficiency (more redundant systems) and specialization within international trade (more efficient systems). In this paper we use methods from Ecological Net- work Analysis (ENA) to capture the countries’ structural resilience building on sector level input-output data. The cross-country analysis shows that countries are heterogeneous in terms of resilience, and the structure of the countries has become more effective and globalized between 2000 and 2014. Using econometrics tools, we find a strong and significant association between redundancy/efficiency and the level of international trade, confirming the use of the complex system perspective in international trade. Finally, we also examine the countries’ level of self-organization and the window of vitality in terms of resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Tibor Kiss & Tamás Sebestyén & Erik Braun, 2021. "Measuring structural resilience of economies: Globalization or deglobalization?," UPFBE Working Paper Series 2021_4, Faculty of Business and Economics, University Pécs.
  • Handle: RePEc:pec:wpaper:2021_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.lib.pte.hu/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/5098/4924
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    resilience; economicstructure; input-outputeconomies; globalization; deglobalization.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pec:wpaper:2021_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tamás Sebestyén (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feptehu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.