IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pdb/pbrief/7.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Emerging New Trade Alliance Scenario: Why the LDCs Should be Concerned

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Zafar Sadique

Abstract

The recent emergence of mega-RTAs could signi­ficantly undermine LDCs’ export to the larger economies (Palit, 2015). The traditional Quad members, namely European Union (EU), the United States (US), Canada, and Japan, along with several other advanced economies and large developing countries, are the key players in the evolving mega regional trade agreements (mega-RTAs). These countries have traditionally provided preferential market access to the LDCs through the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) schemes as well as unilateral and preferential tariff preferences. Elimination of import tariffs on a wide range of items among the participating countries in the mega-RTAs may result in LDCs facing comparatively higher tariffs on their exports while similar export items from the RTA participants are likely to enjoy reduced or duty-free and quota-free (DF-QF) market access. Since the LDCs lack diversi­fication in their exports, the adverse implications of preference erosion are likely to be highly significant both in terms of exports as also the overall economy. It may be noted that a number of participating countries in mega-RTAs are also major export destinations for many LDCs. For example, the US and EU are major destinations for ready-made garment (RMG) exports from Bangladesh and Cambodia. The emerging situation is all the more challenging also because LDCs, by and large, have tended to remain outside the ambit of mega regional negotiations till now.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Zafar Sadique, 2018. "The Emerging New Trade Alliance Scenario: Why the LDCs Should be Concerned," CPD Policy Brief 7, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
  • Handle: RePEc:pdb:pbrief:7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cpd.org.bd/resources/2018/08/Policy-Brief-7-The-Emerging-New-Trade-Alliance-Scenario-Why-the-LDCs-Should-be-Concerned.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mustafizur Rahman & Wasel Bin Shadat, 2006. "NAMA Negotiations in the WTO and Preference Erosion," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 7(2), pages 179-203, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabienne Femenia & Alexandre Gohin, 2007. "Estimating censored and non homothetic demand systems : the generalized maximum entropy appoach," Post-Print hal-02814735, HAL.
    2. Fahmida Khatun & Debapriya Bhattacharya & Mustafizur Rahman, 2013. "Revisiting the PRSP Experience in Bangladesh: Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Inclusiveness," CPD Working Paper 105, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    3. Raihan, Selim & Razzaque, Mohammad A, 2007. "WTO and regional trade negotiation outcomes: quantitative assessments of potential implications on Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 38475, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Mustafizur Rahman, 2014. "Trade Benefits for Least Developed Countries: the Bangladesh Case Market Access Initiatives, Limitations and Policy Recommendations," CDP Background Papers 018, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pdb:pbrief:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Avra Bhattacharjee (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cpdddbd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.