IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osk/wpaper/1428.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How has Sharp Corporation led themselves to crisis: Flexibility in the neighborhood brings rigidity at the core

Author

Listed:
  • Koichi Nakagawa

    (Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University)

  • Yoichi Matsumoto

    (Research institute of economics and business, Kobe university)

  • Yuki Tsuboyama

    (Graduate school of business administration, Hitotsubashi university)

Abstract

Manager fs cognitive biases prohibits from changing organization. But, we do not know in-depth and correctly how do they decide things when they persist in something. We distinguish managerial objects into three categories: focus of attention, neighborhood of focus, and out of focus, and we analyze what kind of decision was made for each category. From the case study of the crisis of Sharp Corporation, we found that managers 1) enthusiastically kept investing and running the LCD panel production (focus of attention), 2) flexibly changed the other strategic options of LCD business like target market, choice of vertical domain or alliances (neighborhood of focus), and 3) nearly ignored the other business areas (out of focus). From such consideration, we hypothetically proposed the logic that flexible changes in neighborhood of focus rather enhance the rigidity in focus of attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Koichi Nakagawa & Yoichi Matsumoto & Yuki Tsuboyama, 2014. "How has Sharp Corporation led themselves to crisis: Flexibility in the neighborhood brings rigidity at the core," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 14-28, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:1428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www2.econ.osaka-u.ac.jp/library/global/dp/1428.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organizational change; Manager fs cognition; focus of attention; Sharp Corporation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:1428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Economic Society of Osaka University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feosujp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.