IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/thesis/d4a5r.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Human Rights Advocacy in Silicon Valley: Civil Society’s Perceptions of Platform Accountability Efforts and Stakeholder Engagement Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Brown, Kayla

    (Center for Open Science)

Abstract

This research project evaluates civil society’s perceptions of human rights advocacy and stakeholder engagement within the particular context of content governance and platform accountability. It is informed by critical theories of new media and scholarship on social movements and social change. Findings reveal that, within the context of platform accountability and content governance, organized civil society advocates for human rights by applying external pressure through media coverage and by networking directly with platform companies, many of which are hiring dedicated human rights leads and establishing more robust stakeholder engagement or governance processes; corporate interests underpin both strategies, however, the individuals interviewed identified the former as the most effective. Although organized civil society is an important counterweight to corporate power, findings reveal that business interests are still a significant barrier to enacting meaningful social change. Findings also suggest that good faith by and good actors within platform companies are ultimately not enough, reinforcing the important role organized civil society plays in increasing democratic accountability, even as private corporations begin to create processes to govern themselves.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, Kayla, 2020. "Human Rights Advocacy in Silicon Valley: Civil Society’s Perceptions of Platform Accountability Efforts and Stakeholder Engagement Processes," Thesis Commons d4a5r, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:d4a5r
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/d4a5r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5f6963f468d85000c18a46a3/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/d4a5r?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:d4a5r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thesiscommons.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.