IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/zf48k.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovations in stock matching and allocations: the social housing challenge

Author

Listed:
  • Levin, Iris
  • Tually, Selina
  • De Vries, Jacqueline
  • Kollmann, Trevor
  • Stone, Wendy
  • Goodwin-Smith, Ian

Abstract

This project examines whether current social housing allocation and matching policies and practices meet the needs of applicants or tenants and maximise social housing sector performance and efficiency outcomes. It looks at how to optimise housing stock allocations based on individual needs (including the role of support) and neighbourhood and community needs (avoiding concentrations of disadvantage and potential antisocial behaviour). ‘Allocation’ is the rationing of access to social housing, and ‘Matching’ is the process of trying to best fit the requirement of allocated households with the attributes of the available stock—including size, location and service access, as well as in terms of community harmony and individual wellbeing. The research reviewed international and Australian policy, interviewed stakeholders across four jurisdictions (QLD, VIC, TAS and SA), developed an evaluation framework (Social Return on Investment - SROI) for housing allocation strategies. The international policy review suggests the Choice-based lettings model could enhance tenants’ choice and reduce stigma; local allocation plans could improve tenant composition and social mix in specific neighbourhoods; policies to address underutilisation of social housing should be carefully considered; and programs integrating support services onsite to address tenants with complex needs should be more widespread. The research findings suggest Governments should view the social housing sector as part of the larger housing market rather than as a separate, standalone system. The sector would benefit from expanding its limited target from tenants with highest need for housing integrated with other support, through to people with high need for housing but no need for other support, to people in need of affordable housing only in various forms.

Suggested Citation

  • Levin, Iris & Tually, Selina & De Vries, Jacqueline & Kollmann, Trevor & Stone, Wendy & Goodwin-Smith, Ian, 2023. "Innovations in stock matching and allocations: the social housing challenge," SocArXiv zf48k, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:zf48k
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/zf48k
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63e465783db095032d1d08f4/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/zf48k?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Infrastructure Victoria, 2016. "Moving from Evaluation to Valuation: Improving project appraisals by monetising more social and environmental impacts," Policy papers 201602, Infrastructure Victoria.
    2. Ashok Das, 2018. "Is innovative also effective? A critique of pro-poor shelter in South-East Asia," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 233-265, April.
    3. Ashok Das, 2018. "Is innovative also effective? A critique of pro-poor shelter in South-East Asia," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 233-265, April.
    4. Suzanne Fitzpatrick & Beth Watts, 2017. "Competing visions: security of tenure and the welfarisation of English social housing," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1021-1038, November.
    5. Alan Morris, 2013. "Public housing in Australia: A case of advanced urban marginality?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 24(1), pages 80-96, March.
    6. Sharam, Andrea & McNelis, Sean & Cho, Hyunbum & Logan, Callum & Burke, Terry & Rossini, Peter, 2021. "Towards an Australian social housing best practice asset management framework," SocArXiv 48a2r, Center for Open Science.
    7. Selina Tually & William Skinner & Debbie Faulkner & Ian Goodwin-Smith, 2020. "(Re)Building Home and Community in the Social Housing Sector: Lessons from a South Australian Approach," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 88-101.
    8. Lawson, Julie & Pawson, Hal & Troy, Laurence & van den Nouwelant, Ryan & Hamilton, Carrie & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Social housing as infrastructure: an investment pathway," SocArXiv e9hky, Center for Open Science.
    9. David Prentice & Rosanna Scutella, 2020. "What are the impacts of living in social housing? New evidence from Australia," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 612-647, April.
    10. Hal Pawson & Kath Hulse, 2011. "Policy Transfer of Choice-based Lettings to Britain and Australia: How Extensive? How Faithful? How Appropriate?," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 113-132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Porter, Libby & Davies, Liam & Ruming, Kristian & Kelly, David & Rogers, Dallas & Flanagan, Kathleen, 2023. "Understanding the drivers and outcomes of public housing tenant relocation," SocArXiv k6ht3, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stone, Wendy & Rowley, Steven & Parkinson, Sharon & James, Amity & Spinney, Angela & Huang, Donna, 2020. "The housing aspirations of Australians across the life-course: closing the ‘housing aspirations gap’," SocArXiv tsfmg, Center for Open Science.
    2. Martin, Chris & Reeve, Rebecca & McCausland, Ruth & Baldry, Eileen & Burton, Pat & White, Rob & Thomas, Stuart, 2021. "Exiting prison with complex support needs: the role of housing assistance," SocArXiv rnk2c, Center for Open Science.
    3. Ghasri, Milad & Stone, Wendy & Easthope, Hazel & Veeroja, Piret, 2022. "Predicting risk to inform housing policy and practice," SocArXiv shk5j, Center for Open Science.
    4. Benedict, Richard & Gurran, Nicole & Gilbert, Catherine & Hamilton, Carrie & Rowley, Steven & Liu, Sha, 2022. "Private sector involvement in social and affordable housing," SocArXiv 9h6qj, Center for Open Science.
    5. Isobel Anderson & Joe Finnerty & Vikki McCall, 2020. "Home, Housing and Communities: Foundations for Inclusive Society," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-4.
    6. Chenzi Yang & Fernando Moreira & Thomas Welsh Archibald, 2023. "Community banks' capital requirements and regional housing tenure," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 723-746, December.
    7. Laurence Murphy, 2016. "The politics of land supply and affordable housing: Auckland’s Housing Accord and Special Housing Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(12), pages 2530-2547, September.
    8. Huang, Donna & valentine, kylie & Cripps, Kyllie & Flanagan, Kathleen & Habibis, Daphne & Martin, Chris & Blunden, Hazel, 2020. "Inquiry into integrated housing support for vulnerable families," SocArXiv kb45q, Center for Open Science.
    9. Kuan-Ju Chen & Chien-Wen Peng & Mei-Hsing Lee, 2021. "Determinants of the Public's Attitude Towards Social Housing Construction Under High Home Ownership Rate," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 87-112.
    10. Flanagan, Kathleen & Martin, Chris & Jacobs, Keith & Lawson, Julie & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2019. "A conceptual analysis of social housing as infrastructure," SocArXiv wmuc4, Center for Open Science.
    11. Martin, Chris & Lawson, Julie & Milligan, Vivienne & Hartley, Chris & Pawson, Hal & Dodson, Jago, 2023. "Towards an Australian Housing and Homelessness Strategy: understanding national approaches in contemporary policy," SocArXiv h5tja, Center for Open Science.
    12. Hulse, Kath & Martin, Chris & James, Amity & Stone, Wendy & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Private rental in transition: institutional change, technology and innovation in Australia," SocArXiv yqbxj, Center for Open Science.
    13. Yanotti, Maria B. & Banks, Marcus & de Silva, Ashton & Anantharama, Nandini & Peter Whiteford, & Bowman, Dina & Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna, 2021. "The utility of new data in understanding housing insecurity," SocArXiv qb4d2, Center for Open Science.
    14. Easthope, Hazel & Palmer, Jasmine & Sharam, Andrea & Nethercote, Megan & Pignatta, Gloria & Crommelin, Laura, 2023. "Delivering sustainable apartment housing: New build and retrofit," SocArXiv z6yn4, Center for Open Science.
    15. Leishman, Chris & Aminpour, Fatemeh & Baker, Emma & Beer, Andrew & Crowe, Adam & Goodall, Zoë & Horton, Ella & Jacobs, Keith & Lester, Laurence & Maclennan, Duncan, 2022. "Australia’s COVID-19 pandemic housing policy responses," SocArXiv yef47, Center for Open Science.
    16. Paul Watt, 2020. "Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 20-33.
    17. Loïc Wacquant & Tom Slater & Virgílio Borges Pereira, 2014. "Territorial Stigmatization in Action," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(6), pages 1270-1280, June.
    18. Walter Dachaga & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Land Tenure Security and Health Nexus: A Conceptual Framework for Navigating the Connections between Land Tenure Security and Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Ferreri, Mara & Sanyal, Romola, 2022. "Digital informalisation: rental housing, platforms, and the management of risk," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112794, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Gurran, Nicole & Hulse, Kath & Dodson, Jago & Pill, Madeleine & Dowling, Robyn & reynolds, margaret & Maalsen, Sophia, 2021. "Urban productivity and affordable rental housing supply in Australian cities and regions," SocArXiv qrdb6, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:zf48k. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.