IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/q495t.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Foundational Inequality – Race Differences in Education Mobility in the US

Author

Listed:
  • Fletcher, Jason
  • Grodsky, Eric
  • Jajtner, Katie

Abstract

Education can break the intergenerational cycle of disadvantage but, like socioeconomic status, education is also persistent across generations (Fletcher & Han, 2019; Hertz et al., 2007). This persistence can erode the power of education to fuel the mobility prospects of members of some groups relative to others. To describe variation in the mobility-enhancing potential of education, we examine sex and racial/ethnic patterns in intergenerational education mobility. Results suggest women unambiguously experience better mobility outcomes relative to males; however, patterns by race/ethnicity are less clear. Although there is evidence of some differentiated education mobility by race/ethnicity, estimates often lack precision. Among males, upward mobility is relatively consistent across race/ethnicity. Downward mobility appears highest among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Americans and lower among Asian Americans relative to non-Hispanic White American males. Females have less evidence of differentiated education mobility across race/ethnicity. Contextual correlates at the individual and spatial levels tend to reveal less upward mobility and more downward mobility for disadvantaged groups; however, certain mobility metrics do not offer consistent findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Fletcher, Jason & Grodsky, Eric & Jajtner, Katie, 2024. "The Foundational Inequality – Race Differences in Education Mobility in the US," SocArXiv q495t, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:q495t
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/q495t
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65a840cf1c92110d9babe68c/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/q495t?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:q495t. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.