IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/h2vc4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Government and Digital Engagement Technologies: The Elusive Search for Consensus

Author

Listed:
  • Lobo-Pulo, Audrey E.

    (The Australian Public Service)

  • Ribas Fernandes, José J. F.

    (Canada Energy Regulator)

  • Hester, Annette
  • Hum, Ryan J.

Abstract

As new digital platforms emerge and governments look at new ways to engage with citizens, there is an increasing awareness of the role these platforms play in shaping public participation and democracy. We examine three case studies on digital engagement (vTaiwan, We the People, and social media), and discuss key considerations for effective public engagement in the digital age: Empowerment, time to deliberate, transparency, useful data, consensus, and dynamic engagement. We hope that these serve as a basis for constructing meaningful engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Lobo-Pulo, Audrey E. & Ribas Fernandes, José J. F. & Hester, Annette & Hum, Ryan J., 2019. "Government and Digital Engagement Technologies: The Elusive Search for Consensus," SocArXiv h2vc4, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:h2vc4
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/h2vc4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5d683df3536cf5001a8674ea/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/h2vc4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loni Hagen & Teresa M. Harrison & Catherine L. Dumas, 2018. "Data Analytics for Policy Informatics: The Case of E-Petitioning," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: J Ramon Gil-Garcia & Theresa A. Pardo & Luis F. Luna-Reyes (ed.), Policy Analytics, Modelling, and Informatics, pages 205-224, Springer.
    2. Hsiao, Yu Tang & Lin, Shu-Yang & Tang, Audrey & Narayanan, Darshana & Sarahe, Claudina, 2018. "vTaiwan: An Empirical Study of Open Consultation Process in Taiwan," SocArXiv xyhft, Center for Open Science.
    3. Catherine Dumas & Teresa M. Harrison & Loni Hagen & Xiaoyi Zhao, 2017. "What Do the People Think?: E-Petitioning and Policy Decision Making," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Alois A. Paulin & Leonidas G. Anthopoulos & Christopher G. Reddick (ed.), Beyond Bureaucracy, pages 187-207, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasuhiro Asa & Takeshi Kato & Ryuji Mine, 2022. "Composite Consensus-Building Process: Permissible Meeting Analysis and Compromise Choice Exploration," Papers 2211.08593, arXiv.org.
    2. Simonofski, Anthony & Handekyn, Phebe & Vandennieuwenborg, Celien & Wautelet, Yves & Snoeck, Monique, 2023. "Smart mobility projects: Towards the formalization of a policy-making lifecycle," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:h2vc4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.