IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/w79pf.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Antara Bank Central Asia Dan Bank Negara Indonesia Berdasarkan Metode Economic Value Added (Eva) Dan Market Valueadded (Mva) Pada Tahun 2011-2015

Author

Listed:
  • Saputra, Jack Tri
  • Dewi, Aminar Sutra

Abstract

This study aims to determine the performance of Bank BCA and Bank BNI using EVA and MVA during the years 2011 to 2015. The study was categorized as a comparative descriptive study. The author chose a sample of a population’s financial statements, issued by PT Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk. The data used are secondary data with engineering documentation. Data analysis method used is Independent Sample T-test. The results showed that there is no difference in financial performance by using thr method EVA and MVA at the Bank BCA with the Bank BNI. From result of the data processing found value t tabel > t hitung that is 2,306 > 1,549 for variables EVA and 2,306 > -2,024 for variables MVA.

Suggested Citation

  • Saputra, Jack Tri & Dewi, Aminar Sutra, 2018. "Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Antara Bank Central Asia Dan Bank Negara Indonesia Berdasarkan Metode Economic Value Added (Eva) Dan Market Valueadded (Mva) Pada Tahun 2011-2015," OSF Preprints w79pf, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:w79pf
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/w79pf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5caafaad2aa0d90018d36608/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/w79pf?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:w79pf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.