IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/tg3r5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unspoken alternatives to expensive housing

Author

Listed:
  • Murray, Cameron

    (The University of Sydney)

Abstract

Secure, affordable housing is a worthy policy objective. Unfortunately, many affordable housing policies are ineffective because they allow monopolist landholders to capture the value of subsidies for themselves. If Australian governments want to enact policies to make housing cheaper for residents, they should focus on housing options that provide residents access to housing without having to pay the monopoly market price. Option 1: The ACT’s Land Rent Scheme (LRS) is a publicly-run housing system that ensures residents get a discount on the market price of land, while providing secure long-term tenure, just as with private ownership. Option 2: Community Land Trusts (CLTs) are a privately-run housing scheme that provide secure long-term housing at below market prices. The CLT is an incorporated entity, much like a ‘land body corporate’, that inserts a layer of control over property ownership for land and dwellings within the trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Murray, Cameron, 2018. "Unspoken alternatives to expensive housing," OSF Preprints tg3r5, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tg3r5
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/tg3r5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5ee72ae1a777b700f8ab2a64/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/tg3r5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tg3r5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.