IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/d8hej.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

This paper is an artefact: On open science practices in design science research using registered reports

Author

Listed:
  • Doyle, Cathal

    (Victoria University of Wellington)

  • Luczak-Roesch, Markus

    (Victoria University of Wellington)

Abstract

Registered reports (RR) are a part of open science where the aim is to improve the rigor of studies, while reducing publication biases, by encouraging researchers to preregister their study by first publishing their research idea, and study design to get feedback from peers before collecting and analysing their data. However, while these benefits could improve the rigor and reliability of DSR studies, there is no evidence of any research using RR, both from a conceptual perspective to understand RR in DSR, or using them to conduct DSR. To begin addressing this problem, this study provides such an understanding of RR from a DSR perspective, and identifies benefits to the discipline. The outcome is a method for creating RR for DSR projects which was built by implementing a RR for this very study where a problem is identified and a study design is outlined which can be viewed here: https://osf.io/9g5au. .....................................................................................................................................................This paper is a preprint of a paper accepted at HICSS 2020 (https://hicss.hawaii.edu/).

Suggested Citation

  • Doyle, Cathal & Luczak-Roesch, Markus, 2019. "This paper is an artefact: On open science practices in design science research using registered reports," OSF Preprints d8hej, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:d8hej
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/d8hej
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5d3a81f2a3c0020016848e12/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/d8hej?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doyle, Cathal & Luczak-Roesch, Markus & Mittal, Abhinav, 2019. "We need the open artefact: Design Science as a pathway to Open Science in Information Systems research," OSF Preprints ye6xp, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doyle, Cathal, 2020. "How Can I Share My Work? A Review of the Open Access Policies of IS Journals," OSF Preprints xr8mv, Center for Open Science.
    2. Selma Leticia Capinzaiki Ottonicar & Paloma Marin Arraiza & Fabiano Armellini, 2020. "Opening Science and Innovation: Opportunities for Emerging Economies," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 95-111.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:d8hej. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.