IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/7xjnk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reflections on evolving conceptions of selection bias

Author

Listed:
  • Mathur, Maya B
  • Shpitser, Ilya

Abstract

We respond to Lu et al.'s commentary on our recent paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathur, Maya B & Shpitser, Ilya, 2024. "Reflections on evolving conceptions of selection bias," OSF Preprints 7xjnk, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7xjnk
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7xjnk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65a73f581c92110c96abe35f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/7xjnk?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karthika Mohan & Judea Pearl, 2021. "Graphical Models for Processing Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(534), pages 1023-1037, April.
    2. Mats J. Stensrud & Jessica G. Young & Vanessa Didelez & James M. Robins & Miguel A. Hernán, 2022. "Separable Effects for Causal Inference in the Presence of Competing Events," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(537), pages 175-183, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heng Chen & Daniel F. Heitjan, 2022. "Analysis of local sensitivity to nonignorability with missing outcomes and predictors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1342-1352, December.
    2. Simon Calmar Andersen & Louise Beuchert & Phillip Heiler & Helena Skyt Nielsen, 2023. "A Guide to Impact Evaluation under Sample Selection and Missing Data: Teacher's Aides and Adolescent Mental Health," Papers 2308.04963, arXiv.org.
    3. Yilin Li & Wang Miao & Ilya Shpitser & Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2023. "A self‐censoring model for multivariate nonignorable nonmonotone missing data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3203-3214, December.
    4. Raúl Estrada-Lavilla & José Ruiz-Navarro, 2024. "Method for and Analysis of Early-Stage Firm Growth Patterns Using World Bank Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Anders Skrondal, 2023. "Ignoring Non-ignorable Missingness," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 31-50, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7xjnk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.