IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/2fphv.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Journal of the History of Economic Thought Preprints – Edmond Malinvaud's Criticisms of the New Classical Economics: Restoring the Nature and the Rationale of the Old Keynesians' Opposition

Author

Listed:
  • Renault, Matthieu

Abstract

Unlike standard accounts, recent research in the history of macroeconomics has given increasing attention to the Old Keynesians’ criticisms of the New Classical Economics. In this paper, I address the case of Edmond Malinvaud, who began opposing the latter from the early 1980s and did so throughout the following thirty years. This study shows that his opposition was radical, i.e., multidimensional and systematic, and owes to the methodology and the practice of macroeconometric modeling. In turn, this twofold result sheds light on the nature and the rationale of the Old Keynesians’ opposition to the New Classical Economics from the 1970s onwards, which can be interpreted along the same lines.

Suggested Citation

  • Renault, Matthieu, 2019. "Journal of the History of Economic Thought Preprints – Edmond Malinvaud's Criticisms of the New Classical Economics: Restoring the Nature and the Rationale of the Old Keynesians' Opposition," OSF Preprints 2fphv, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2fphv
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2fphv
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5e230bcaedceab00fa82e694/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/2fphv?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2fphv. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.