IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/lawarx/3ma8j.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Article 2 of the UCC: Some Thoughts on Success or Failure In the Twenty-First Century

Author

Listed:
  • Hillman, Robert A.
  • Library, Cornell

Abstract

The volume of litigation on Uniform Commercial Code Article 2, along with the rise of e-commerce, raises the question of whether Article 2 can succeed in the twenty-first century. There are, of course, many ways to measure success or failure of legislation. One strategy, applied here, is to evaluate Article 2 against the UCC’s ambitious “purposes and policies” of simplifying, clarifying, and modernizing commercial law, supporting commercial practices, and promoting uniformity of the law among the states. In doing so, I ask three questions that help determine when particular sections of Article 2 impede these goals and are ripe for revision: 1. Does Article 2 continue to generate litigation? 2. Does Article 2 keep up with twenty-first century technology? 3. Does Article 2 impede twenty-first century commercial practices? These questions are obviously related. Based on the analysis, I will identify some problematic Article 2 sections, and some that need no tinkering. In the conclusion, I briefly consider next steps if the climate for revision of Article is renewed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hillman, Robert A. & Library, Cornell, 2018. "Article 2 of the UCC: Some Thoughts on Success or Failure In the Twenty-First Century," LawArXiv 3ma8j, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:lawarx:3ma8j
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3ma8j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5a538f5551f54c000d826a05/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/3ma8j?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarx:3ma8j. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/lawarxiv/discover .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.