IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/ecoevo/k9jdy.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Global Forest Health Crisis: A Public Good Social Dilemma in Need of International Collective Action

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Geoffrey
  • Ginzel, Matthew D.
  • Ma, Zhao
  • Adams, Damian C.
  • Campbell, Faith
  • Lovett, Gary M.
  • Pildain, María Belén
  • Raffa, Kenneth F.
  • Gandhi, Kamal J. K.
  • Santini, Alberto

Abstract

Society is confronted by interconnected threats to ecological sustainability. Among these is the devastation of forests by destructive non-native pathogens and insects introduced through global trade, leading to the loss of critical ecosystem services and a global forest health crisis. We argue that the forest health crisis is a public good social dilemma and propose a response framework that incorporates principles of collective action. This framework will enable scientists to better engage policymakers and empower the public to advocate for proactive biosecurity and forest health management. Collective action in forest health will feature broadly inclusive stakeholder engagement to build trust and set goals; accountability for destructive pest introductions; pooled support for weakest-link partners; and inclusion of intrinsic and non-market values of forest ecosystems in risk assessment. We provide short-term and longer-term measures that incorporate the above principles to shift the societal and ecological forest health paradigm to a more resilient state.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Geoffrey & Ginzel, Matthew D. & Ma, Zhao & Adams, Damian C. & Campbell, Faith & Lovett, Gary M. & Pildain, María Belén & Raffa, Kenneth F. & Gandhi, Kamal J. K. & Santini, Alberto, 2022. "The Global Forest Health Crisis: A Public Good Social Dilemma in Need of International Collective Action," EcoEvoRxiv k9jdy, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:ecoevo:k9jdy
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/k9jdy
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/622a83754ef4bb0a9233383d/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/k9jdy?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:ecoevo:k9jdy. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ecoevorxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.