IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ohe/grafun/002154.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The WHO Technical Report on the Pricing of Cancer Medicines: Missing a central role for HTA and value assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Brassel;Olga Rozanova;Adrian Towse

Abstract

The WHO Technical Report: Pricing of cancer medicines and its impacts (“the Report”) was published in order to address requests made in a resolution adopted by the 2018 Seventieth World Health Assembly WHA70.12 on Cancer prevention and control in the context of an integrated approach. At the end of 2018 the WHO Technical Report: Pricing of cancer medicines and its impacts (“the Report”) was published in order to address requests made in a resolution adopted by the 2018 Seventieth World Health Assembly WHA70.12 on Cancer prevention and control in the context of an integrated approach. The Report dismisses value assessment and the fundamental role of value assessment in delivering value for money. This is inconsistent with both existing WHA policy on HTA and the reality that more and more payers in WHO Member States are using value assessment analyses to support their purchasing decisions. Secondly, the Report lacks proposals to enable differential pricing and managed entry agreements to happen. Both can increase access while setting the right incentives for future innovation if implemented correctly. Lastly the report calls for price transparency and price caps which are likely to have a negative impact on differential pricing and managed entry agreements, reducing access to treatment for patients and producing less innovation in the future. Much of the emphasis of the Report is that the R&D “supply side” is not working as the authors would like, but we are not convinced that this is the major challenge. Supply responds to demand and the real challenge is to get demand side reforms that use new treatments efficiently and send the right signals to industry about the new cancer treatments (and associated health gains) that payers want to fund. The Report fails to promote mechanisms and processes (value assessment and related pricing and purchasing arrangements) that are key to efficient pricing and use of cancer medicines. This is a missed opportunity.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Brassel;Olga Rozanova;Adrian Towse, 2019. "The WHO Technical Report on the Pricing of Cancer Medicines: Missing a central role for HTA and value assessment," Grant-Funded Research 002154, Office of Health Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ohe:grafun:002154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ohe.org/publications/who-technical-report-pricing-cancer-medicines-missing-central-role-hta-and-value/attachment-ohe-commentary-on-who-report-v5_final/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    The WHO Technical Report on the Pricing of Cancer Medicines: Missing a central role for HTA and value assessment;

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ohe:grafun:002154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ohecouk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.