IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ohe/conres/001802.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring the Assessment and Appraisal of Regenerative Medicines and Cell Therapy Products: Is the NICE Approach Fit for Purpose?

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Hampson;Adrian Towse

Abstract

In 2016 the University of York undertook a review exercise to determine whether NICE’s existing methods and processes are appropriate for assessment of regenerative medicines. The purpose of this OHE report is to explore this review exercise and to assess whether or not the resulting conclusions are appropriate. The Report concludes that the York and NICE exercise provided a thorough mock appraisal of CAR T cell therapy. However, it did not seek to identify the most suitable approach for assessing regenerative medicines, but rather to test whether regenerative medicines could fit into the existing pathway developed for conventional medicines. The authors suggest a more interesting question would have been to look at whether or not use of the existing pathway is the most suitable approach, rather than whether or not it is possible. The report also questions the relevance of some additional parameters that were presented to the expert panel as part of the mock appraisal, arguing that the presentation of uncertainty is potentially misleading. It also suggests that NICE’s end of life criteria and criteria for allowing use of a 1.5% discount rate should be amended in the context of regenerative medicines.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Hampson;Adrian Towse, 2017. "Exploring the Assessment and Appraisal of Regenerative Medicines and Cell Therapy Products: Is the NICE Approach Fit for Purpose?," Contract Research 001802, Office of Health Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ohe:conres:001802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ohe.org/publications/exploring-assessment-and-appraisal-regenerative-medicines-and-cell-therapy-products/attachment-final-report-nice-car-t-february-2017/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ohe:conres:001802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ohecouk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.