IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaah/4-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

International Trade and Good Regulatory Practices: Assessing The Trade Impacts of Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Basedow

    (OECD)

  • Céline Kauffmann

    (OECD)

Abstract

Good Regulatory Practices encompassing the use of regulatory impact assessments, stakeholder engagement and ex post evaluation are a critical tool in the hands of governments to ensure that regulation achieves its objectives. Over the past several years, attention has grown for the trade costs of regulatory divergence. Diverging regulation may increase the costs to trade goods and services across borders. While regulatory divergence is often the result of diverging national public policy objectives, it may be the undesired result of rule-making ignoring the international regulatory environment and interconnectedness of our societies and economies. Good Regulatory Practices provide governments with tools, processes and strategic approaches that can help them identify and evaluate the trade impacts of their regulatory action. The paper reviews the theoretical and practical contribution of GRP to mainstreaming international trade considerations in regulatory decision-making and to addressing regulatory divergence. It does so by reviewing the relevant academic literature, GRP guidelines of a number of OECD members and examples of how GRP and in particular regulatory impact assessments are used to consider the trade impacts of regulation. Building on the available evidence, the paper discusses how decision-makers may enhance the use of GRP to address international trade considerations in regulatory policy-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Basedow & Céline Kauffmann, 2016. "International Trade and Good Regulatory Practices: Assessing The Trade Impacts of Regulation," OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers 4, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:4-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jlv59hdgtf5-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlv59hdgtf5-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jlv59hdgtf5-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matteo Fiorini & Bernard Hoekman, 2020. "EU services trade liberalization and economic regulation: Complements or substitutes?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 247-270, January.
    2. Hoekman,Bernard M., 2020. "Facilitating Trade in Services," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9228, The World Bank.
    3. Bernard Hoekman & Charles Sabel, 2017. "Trade Agreements, Regulatory Sovereignty and Democratic Legitimacy," RSCAS Working Papers 2017/36, European University Institute.
    4. Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена), 2018. "OECD Requirements to the Quality of State Policy Development and State Regulation and the Possibility of Their Accounting in Russian Conditions [Требования Оэср К Качеству Разработки Государственно," Working Papers 041809, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ex post evaluation; good regulatory practices; regulatory impact assessment; regulatory policy; stakeholder engagement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:4-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.