IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaah/1-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

2015 Indicators of Regulatory Policy and Governance: Design, Methodology and Key Results

Author

Listed:
  • Christiane Arndt

    (OECD)

  • Antonia Custance Baker
  • Tobias Querbach

    (OECD)

  • Rebecca Schultz

    (OECD)

Abstract

This paper presents the methodology, key results and statistical analysis of the 2015 Indicators for Regulatory Policy Governance (iREG) to complement the OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2015. Three composite indicators were constructed corresponding to three key principles of the 2012 OECD Recommendation of the Council on Regulatory Policy and Governance: Regulatory Impact Assessment; stakeholder engagement; and ex post evaluation. This paper explains the process by which the indicators were developed, presents main results, and outcomes of different sensitivity analyses that were performed to test the robustness of the methodology, including principal components analysis, Monte Carlo analysis and weight-sensitivity analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Christiane Arndt & Antonia Custance Baker & Tobias Querbach & Rebecca Schultz, 2015. "2015 Indicators of Regulatory Policy and Governance: Design, Methodology and Key Results," OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers 1, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:1-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jrnwqm3zp43-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrnwqm3zp43-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jrnwqm3zp43-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paulo Correa & Marcus Melo & Bernardo Mueller & Carlos Pereira, 2019. "Political interference and regulatory resilience in Brazil," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 540-560, December.
    2. Hugo J. Fuentes & Gustavo Mendoza & Miguel A. Montoya & Ismael Aguilar, 2021. "Public-private partnerships in Mexico: Challenges and opportunities at local level," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 22(1), pages 35-52, March.
    3. Lee, Jongyearn, 2019. "Easier Set Than Done: Stakeholder Engagement as Public-Private Partnership in Regulatory Policy of South Korea," KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Korea Development Institute (KDI), vol. 41(3), pages 39-75.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    composite indicators; consultation; evaluation; oversight; regulatory impact assessment; transparency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J5 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining
    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • O5 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:1-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.