Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The Joint Distribution of Household Income and Wealth: Evidence from the Luxembourg Wealth Study


Author Info

  • Markus Jantti
  • Eva Sierminska
  • Tim Smeeding


This report looks at the extent to which household net worth and disposable income are correlated across individuals. After having briefly discussed the importance of better information on household wealth for social policies, the paper describes the main features of the Luxembourg Wealth Study – a collaborative project to assemble existing micro-data on household wealth into a coherent database that aims to do for wealth what the Luxembourg Income Study has achieved for income– and some of the basic patterns highlighted by these data, while noting the important methodological features that affect comparability. The main bulk of the report focuses on the joint distribution of income and wealth. While the comprehensive definition of wealth used (i.e. including business equity) allows covering only five OECD countries, the analysis uncovers a number of patterns. In particular, household net worth and disposable income are highly, but not perfectly correlated across people within each country. Many of the people classified as income poor do have some assets, although both the prevalence of holding and the amounts are clearly lower than among the general population. While part of the positive association between disposable income and net worth reflects observable characteristics of households, such as age and education of the household head, a sizeable correlation remains even after controlling for these characteristics. Ce rapport examine la corrélation entre le patrimoine des ménages et leur revenu disponible. Après avoir brièvement évoqué l’importance d’une meilleure information sur les patrimoines pour les politiques sociales, le document décrit les principales caractéristiques du Luxembourg Wealth Study (LWS) – un projet mené pour réunir les micro-données existantes sur le patrimoine des ménages dans une base de données cohérente, visant à accomplir pour les patrimoines ce que le Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) a réussi pour les revenus. Le rapport décrit quelques aspects fondamentaux mis en relief par ces données, tout en notant les caractéristiques méthodologiques qui ont un effet sur la comparabilité internationale. La partie centrale du rapport se concentre sur la distribution conjointe du patrimoine et du revenu. Alors que la définition du patrimoine utilisée (incluant les actifs professionnels) permet de couvrir seulement cinq pays de l’OCDE, l’analyse révèle un nombre d’éléments. La corrélation entre patrimoine et revenu disponible des individus dans chaque pays est élevée mais pas pour autant parfaite. Beaucoup de personnes ayant un revenu inférieur au seuil de pauvreté ont un patrimoine positif, bien que les personnes dans cette situation et les montants détenus soient clairement plus faibles que pour la population dans son ensemble. Si une partie de la corrélation positive entre revenu et patrimoine révèle des caractéristiques observables des ménages, telles que l’âge et l’éducation des chefs de famille, il n’en demeure pas moins qu’une corrélation non négligeable subsiste même après avoir contrôlé l’effet de ces caractéristiques.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers with number 65.

as in new window
Date of creation: 28 May 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:65-en

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Related research


Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Frank A Cowell, 2011. "Inequality among the Wealthy," CASE Papers /150, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
  2. Frank Cowell & Eleni Karagiannaki & Abigail McKnight, 2013. "Accounting for cross-country differences in wealth inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 51283, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  3. Francisco Azpitarte, 2010. "Measuring poverty using both income and wealth: A cross-country comparison between the U.S. and Spain," Working Papers 153, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
  4. Andreas Peichl & Nico Pestel, 2011. "Multidimensional affluence: Theory and applications to Germany and the US," Working Papers 218, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
  5. repec:cep:sticas:case168 is not listed on IDEAS
  6. Francisco Azpitarte, 2010. "Measuring Poverty Using Both Income and Wealth: An Empirical Comparison of Multidimensional Approaches Using Data for the U.S. and Spain," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_620, Levy Economics Institute.
  7. Maurizio Franzini & Mario Pianta, 2011. "Explaining inequality in today’s capitalism," Working Papers 1108, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2011.
  8. Frank Cowell & Karagiannaki, E. & Abigail Mcknight, 2013. "GINI DP 72: Accounting for cross-country differences in wealth inequality," GINI Discussion Papers 72, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:65-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.