This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Central Control of Regional Budget: Theory with Applications to Russia

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
John M. Litwack
Abstract

Motivated by the recent experience in the Russian Federation, this paper examines the implications of imposing central control on the budgetary activities of a subnational government. In a highly stylised multi-task principal-agent model (Holmstrom and Milgrom (1991)), a central government cannot directly monitor the informal budgetary operations of a regional administration, but seeks to improve fiscal policies by exerting control over a “formal” regional budget and imposing (limited) costs on informal behaviour. In the static case of the model, the control of subnational budgetary operations by a benevolent central government may increase social welfare, but at the expense of higher (implicit and explicit) taxation of economic organisations in the region, lower output, and a strong orientation of informal policies toward rent seeking activities. The additional imposition of costs on regions for conducting informal budgetary operations has multiple (indeterminate) effects in ...


Motivé par l’expérience récente de la fédération de Russie, cette étude examine les conséquences d’un contrôle central imposé sur les activités budgétaires des administrations locales. Dans un modèle principal-agent multi fonction (Holmstrom and Milgrom (1991)), le gouvernement central ne peut pas observer les opérations budgétaires informelles d’une administration régionale, mais il cherche à améliorer les politiques budgétaires en faisant un effort de contrôle sur le budget régional “officiel” et en imposant des coûts (limités) sur des activités informelles. Dans le modèle statique, le contrôle des opérations budgétaires locales par un gouvernement central bienveillant pourrait augmenter le bien-être social, mais au prix d’une taxation plus forte (implicite et explicite) des organisations économiques de la région, d’une production plus faible, et d’une orientation marquée des politiques informelles vers la recherche de rentes. L’imposition supplémentaire de coûts sur les régions ...

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/560325048014
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by OECD, Economics Department in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 275.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 10 Jan 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:275-en

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Email:
Web page: http://www.oecd.org
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: fiscal decentralisation; intergovernmental relations; Russian economy; décentralisation fiscale; économie russe; relations intergouvernementales;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search, Learning, and Information
H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
H39 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Other
H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc encourages publishers to make their bibliographic data freely available to the public.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-18.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.