IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/dafaab/20-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pension Fund Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Antolín

    (OECD)

Abstract

This report provides an analysis of aggregate investment performance by country on a risk adjusted basis using relatively standard investment performance measures. The report also describes privately managed pension funds around the world and the regulatory environment they face. It compares pension funds across countries according to total assets under management and asset allocation, and briefly discusses certain issues surrounding the data reported by pension funds and regulators on investment returns. La Performance des Fonds de Pensions Ce rapport fournit une analyse par pays des performances d‘investissement ajustées en fonction du risque et en utilisant des mesures de performance standards. Le rapport décrit également les fonds de pensions privées dans le monde et les régulations auxquels les fonds doivent satisfaire. Il compare les fonds de pension par pays selon leurs actifs totaux et l‘allocation de ceux-ci, et examine brièvement les problèmes avec les données rapportées par les fonds de pension et les régulateurs concernant le rendement des investissements.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Antolín, 2008. "Pension Fund Performance," OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions 20, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:dafaab:20-en
    DOI: 10.1787/240401404057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/240401404057
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/240401404057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Senderski, Marcin, 2014. "Assessing the strictness of portfolio-related regulation of pension funds: Rethinking the definition of prudent," MPRA Paper 56610, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Rayna Tsaneva, 2013. "Characteristic features of the investment activities of the pension funds in Bulgaria," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 100-119.
    3. Krzysztof Kompa & Dorota Witkowska, 2014. "Pension Funds in Poland: Efficiency Analysis for Years 1999-2013," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 14, pages 105-124.
    4. Abinzano, I. & Muga, L. & Santamaria, R., 2017. "Bad company. The indirect effect of differences in corporate governance in the pension plan industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 63-75.
    5. Anastasia Petraki & Anna Zalewska, 2013. "With whom and in what is it better to save? Personal pensions in the UK," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 13/304, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    6. Raimonds Lieksnis, 2010. "Evaluating the Financial Performance of Latvian and Estonian Second-Pillar Pension Funds," Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, vol. 2(2).
    7. Anastasia Petraki & Anna Zalewska, 2017. "Jumping over a low hurdle: personal pension fund performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 153-190, January.
    8. Artiga González, Tanja & van Lelyveld, Iman & Lučivjanská, Katarína, 2020. "Pension fund equity performance: Patience, activity or both?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Ales S. BERK & Mitja COK & Marko KOSAK & Joze SAMBT, 2013. "CEE Transition from PAYG to Private Pensions: Income Gaps and Asset Allocation," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 63(4), pages 360-381, August.
    10. Pierre Matek & Marko Lukač & Vedrana Repač, 2015. "Performance appraisal of Croatian mandatory pension funds," Effectus - Working Paper Series 0004, Effectus - University College for Law and Finance.
    11. Tanja Artiga Gonzalez & Iman van Lelyveld & Katarina Lucivjanska, 2018. "Pension fund equity performance: Patience, activity or both?," DNB Working Papers 606, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    12. Pierre Matek & Marko Lukaè & Vedrana Repac, 2015. "Performance appraisal of Croatian mandatory pension funds," FIP - Journal of Finance and Law, Effectus - University College for Law and Finance, vol. 4(1), pages 7-30.
    13. Anastasia Petraki & Anna Zalewska, 2013. "Jumping over a low hurdle: Personal pension fund performance," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 13/305, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    14. Draženović Bojana Olgić & Hodžić Sabina & Maradin Dario, 2019. "The Efficiency of Mandatory Pension Funds: Case of Croatia," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 82-94, December.
    15. Yundan Guo & Li Shen, 2023. "Commercial Retirement FOFs in China: Investment and Persistence Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    allocation d'actifs; asset allocation; fonds de pension; investment performance; Markowitz mean-variance portfolio maximization; maximisation du portefeuille Markowitz mean-variance; pension fund; performance des investissements; returns on investment; Sharpe ratio; Sharpe ratio;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dafaab:20-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.