IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ocp/rpaper/pp-1921.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Selective Review of Food Security Policy Worldwide: What can be learned from international experiences in order to shape food security policy in Africa?

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Tsakok
  • Fatima Ezzahra Mengoub

Abstract

We are living through unprecedented times. The COVID-19 pandemic threatens not only our health, but the very foundation of life itself: our food security. Now more than ever, we are forced to rethink our food security as we witness the widespread dislocations to our food system, forcing millions to beg for food for the first time. During normal times, our world produces enough nutritious food for all but millions still go hungry every day. Why does this happen and what can be done to end this scourge? Nearly 75 years after the end of the Second World War, since when many countries have pursued policies to achieve food security, it is befitting to take stock and ask ourselves what has been achieved, at what cost, and what have we learnt that can help us better thrive in a post COVID-19 pandemic world. Many countries, with different political systems, and at different levels of development, have equated food security with food self-sufficiency (FSS) and/or food sovereignty (FSY).

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Tsakok & Fatima Ezzahra Mengoub, 2020. "Selective Review of Food Security Policy Worldwide: What can be learned from international experiences in order to shape food security policy in Africa?," Research papers & Policy papers 1921, Policy Center for the New South.
  • Handle: RePEc:ocp:rpaper:pp-1921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/PP_20-18_Mengoub_Tsakok.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:rpaper:pp-1921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.