IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ocp/rpaper/pp-1521.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade and Labor Market Outcomes: Does Export Sophistication Affect Women’s Wage Employment?

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Baliamoune

Abstract

We explore whether improved export sophistication increases women’s participation in wage employment. Using panel data from a large group of developing and emerging economies, and Fixed-effects and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimators, we find that export sophistication has significant and mostly positive effects on women’s participation in paid employment in all regions, but these effects are nonlinear, since they become positive only after a threshold level of sophistication is attained. We also find stronger positive impacts of export sophistication on women’s share of wage employment in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Latin America relative to other regions. Additionally, and after accounting for the impact of export sophistication, we find that openness to trade has a positive effect on women’s share of wage employment through its interplay with high levels of foreign direct investment (FDI). The evidence for an independent positive effect from trade is less robust (it is only robust in the GMM estimations), but there are significant regional differences. Notably, we find a robust negative independent (direct) effect in North Africa and a positive impact in SSA.

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Baliamoune, 2021. "Trade and Labor Market Outcomes: Does Export Sophistication Affect Women’s Wage Employment?," Research papers & Policy papers 1937, Policy Center for the New South.
  • Handle: RePEc:ocp:rpaper:pp-1521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/PP-15-21-Mina%20Baliamoune.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:rpaper:pp-1521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.