The paper examines some implications of the wholly reasonable assumption that the elasticity of intertemporal substitution (the EIS) increases with the level of consumption. Then the rich find it easier to substitute future consumption for present consumption than do the poor. In the empirical macro-economics literature the same assumption has been employed and vindicated in cross-section analysis by Attansio and Browning (1995). Here the approach is to build theoretical models of two kinds of poverty traps. A family of explicit direct utility functions that yield the required property is exhibited. Members of this family can give weak b-convergence in a Ramsey-style growth model, or multiple stable solutions in the Diamond capital model. The last finding is in strong contrast to the monograph De La Croix (2002), which leaves the impression that multiple stable solutions are unlikely.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford in its series Economics Papers with number
2004-W26.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)