Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Judicial Control of Tax Negotiation

Contents:

Author Info

  • Sandra Eden
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This article considers the supervisory jurisdiction of the UK courts through an examination of their control of the UK tax authorities. It concentrates on the conditions under which the tax authorities have been authorized by the UK courts to enter extra statutory arrangements to afford some taxpayers concessional treatment. The article considers the basis of judicial review and then examines the legislative framework within which the Revenue operates. With this background the article considers the principles of judicial review in tax cases. Starting with the general principles, it then examines the argument that the Revenue makes extra statutory concessions on the basis of its powers of care and management and it considers the limitations of that argument. The cases dealing with legitimate expectation are examined too, as are the limits on the legitimate expectation principle. Finally, the article considers “the slippery principle of equality” within the UK constitution and the equally frustrating (for third parties) problem of establishing locus standi. The article concludes that there are significant tensions between competing interests when the Courts review the Revenue’s granting of extra statutory concessions. They seem to have afforded the taxing authorities considerable autonomy in their fulfilment of their management function, but they have limited them to the exercise of discretion only in the course of their care and management of the tax system and in the context of their primary duty to collect tax. The author concludes that the courts have done well in balancing the interests of the tax authorities and taxpayer but that wider interests, such as equality between taxpayers, have not fared as well.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au/ejtr
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by ATAX, University of New South Wales in its series Taxation with number eJournal of Tax Research Vol 3 No. 1.

    as in new window
    Length: 23 pages
    Date of creation: 29 Jun 2005
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:nsw:discus:311

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Cliffbrook Campus, Sydney NSW 2052
    Phone: +61 (0) 2 9385 9333
    Fax: +61 (0) 2 9385 9380
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au
    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information:
    Web: http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au/research

    Related research

    Keywords: Judicial power; tax; Judicial review; courts; tax authorities; Revenue;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsw:discus:311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Research Assistant) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Research Assistant to update the entry or send us the correct address.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.