IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/19-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Foreign Policy Opinion Poll in Japan on Development Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Naoki Ando

    (Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA))

Abstract

Foreign Policy Opinion Poll in Japan, which has been conducted by Japanese government since 1977, shows that the public support for "Development Cooperation" (or Official Development Assistance) has dynamically reflected series of historical events under three socioeconomic dimensions. The three dimensions are (i) Japanese economy, (ii) Japan-China relationship (China was one of the largest recipients of Japanese ODA), and (iii) international contribution by Japan. Since 1990 until 2004, "Development Cooperation" has lost support from citizens because of (i) economic recession and growing public debt after burst of bubble economy in 1991, and (ii) negative Japanese sentiment toward China after Tiananmen Square Incident. However, the public support toward "Development Cooperation" has been recovered since 2005 up to now although Japanese economy was hit by Lehman's shock in 2008 and pulled down by the huge earthquake in 2011. Why this recovery of the public support happened and has been sustained? Termination of new financial ODA to China in 2007 might be one answer. However, this paper suggests that this recovery can be explained mainly by rising expectation of Japanese citizens toward international contribution from Japan. After 2005, Japanese citizens began to expect that the soft power of Japan should be strengthened through its international contribution, while they noticed comparative decline of economic power of Japan. "Development Cooperation" is expected to be implemented not merely based upon humanitarian purpose nor obligation as developed countries, but more importantly should be conducted based upon “national interests” in a broad sense, such as fostering international trust to Japan, achieving mutual prosperity of Japan and the developing countries, securing access to energy and natural resources, and so on. The continuous cut of ODA budget for more than two decades is no longer justified under the matured public opinion.

Suggested Citation

  • Naoki Ando, 2019. "Foreign Policy Opinion Poll in Japan on Development Cooperation," GRIPS Discussion Papers 19-23, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:ngi:dpaper:19-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=1724&item_no=1&attribute_id=20&file_no=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ngi:dpaper:19-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gripsjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.