IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/30363.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stress, Ethnicity, and Prosocial Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Haushofer
  • Sara Lowes
  • Abednego Musau
  • David M. Ndetei
  • Nathan Nunn
  • Moritz Poll
  • Nancy Qian

Abstract

While observational evidence suggests that people behave more prosocially towards members of their own ethnic group, many laboratory studies fail to find this effect. One possible explanation is that coethnic preference only emerges during times of stress. To test this hypothesis, we pharmacologically increase levels of the stress hormone cortisol, after which participants complete laboratory experiments with coethnics and noncoethnics. We find mixed evidence that increased cortisol decreases prosocial behavior. Coethnic preferences do not vary with cortisol. However, in contrast to previous studies, we find strong and robust evidence of coethnic preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Haushofer & Sara Lowes & Abednego Musau & David M. Ndetei & Nathan Nunn & Moritz Poll & Nancy Qian, 2022. "Stress, Ethnicity, and Prosocial Behavior," NBER Working Papers 30363, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30363
    Note: DEV POL
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w30363.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlo Perroni & Kimberly Scharf & Sarah Smith & Oleksandr Talavera & Linh Vi, 2024. "Local Crime and Prosocial Attitudes: Evidence from Charitable Donations," Discussion Papers 24-02, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.