IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/30286.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are Menthol Smokers Different? An Economic Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Chun Cheng
  • Donald S. Kenkel
  • Alan D. Mathios
  • Hua Wang

Abstract

Of the 45.7 million current smokers in the U.S. age 12 and over, more than 18.5 million usually smoke menthol cigarettes. The Food and Drug Administration recently proposed a tobacco product standard that would prohibit menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes. The FDA concludes that the prohibition of menthol in cigarettes is appropriate for public health, meeting the criterion established by the 2009 Tobacco Control Act. In this paper we explore whether there are internality-based market failures that provide an applied welfare economics rationale to prohibit menthol. Our empirical approach provides descriptive evidence from the 2018-2019 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey on how menthol use is associated with smokers’ market demand along multiple intensive and extensive margins. We also use direct measures of smoking-related misinformation and internalities, and stated preference data, from a 2021 Cornell Online Survey. We acknowledge that the associations we document in observational data might reflect bias due to self-selection into menthol use. We discuss several lines of evidence about whether self-selection into menthol use might be mainly quasi-random. We leave it to reader whether there is convincing evidence that differential levels of internality-based market failures are a sufficient justification for the proposed prohibition of menthol cigarettes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Chun Cheng & Donald S. Kenkel & Alan D. Mathios & Hua Wang, 2022. "Are Menthol Smokers Different? An Economic Perspective," NBER Working Papers 30286, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30286
    Note: EH
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w30286.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.