IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/29930.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Intimate Partner Violence and Income: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit

Author

Listed:
  • Resul Cesur
  • Núria Rodriguez-Planas
  • Jennifer Roff
  • David Simon

Abstract

We estimate the impact of an exogenous increase in income on the incidence and intensity of intimate partner violence (IPV). Using the National Crime Victimization Survey data from 1992 to 2000, we exploit time and family-size variation in the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) by comparing IPV victimization of women with one or more children (our “treated” group) to that of women with no children (our comparison group) before and after OBRA-93. The OBRA-93 expansion reduces both reports of any physical or sexual assault and counts of physical or sexual assaults per 100 women surveyed, with the effects being strongest for those groups more likely to both experience IPV and be eligible for EITC: unmarried women and black women. If increased income (rather than changes in employment) is the only channel by which the EITC decreases IPV, an additional $1,000 of after-tax income decreases the incidence of physical and sexual violence of unmarried low-educated women by 9.73% and the intensity of physical and sexual violence by 21%. We explore potential mechanisms behind these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Resul Cesur & Núria Rodriguez-Planas & Jennifer Roff & David Simon, 2022. "Intimate Partner Violence and Income: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit," NBER Working Papers 29930, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29930
    Note: CH EH LS PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w29930.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • J08 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics Policies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.