IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/29614.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Interest Received by Banks during the Financial Crisis: LIBOR vs Hypothetical SOFR Loans

Author

Listed:
  • Urban Jermann

Abstract

The credit sensitivity of LIBOR helped lenders during the financial crisis. SOFR is not credit-sensitive and would not have provided that support. The cumulative additional interest from LIBOR during the crisis is estimated to be between 1% to 2% of the notional amount of outstanding loans, depending on the tenor and type of SOFR rate used. The amount of LIBOR business loans owned by banks could have been as high as about 2trn, and the overall additional interest income banks received thanks to LIBOR could have been as high as 30bn dollars. The analysis also shows that a compounded SOFR reduces insurance relative to a term SOFR.

Suggested Citation

  • Urban Jermann, 2021. "Interest Received by Banks during the Financial Crisis: LIBOR vs Hypothetical SOFR Loans," NBER Working Papers 29614, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29614
    Note: AP CF
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w29614.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darrell Duffie & Cooperman Harry & Stephan Luck & Zachry Wang & Yilin Yang, 2022. "Bank Funding Risk, Reference Rates, and Credit Supply," Staff Reports 1042, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    2. Indriawan, Ivan & Jiao, Feng & Tse, Yiuman, 2022. "Price discovery between forward-looking SOFR and LIBOR," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E43 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.