IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/29182.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eclipses and the Memory of Revolutions: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Miao
  • Jacopo Ponticelli
  • Yi Shao

Abstract

Why are certain communities more prone to anti-government protests than others? Do past rebellions lead to more protests today? We study the historical roots of anti-government protests using the experience of China. We document that counties with higher incidence of peasant uprisings against local government officials during the Qing dynasty period (1644-1912) have a higher incidence of anti-government protests in present-day China. To generate plausibly exogenous variation in the incidence of past protests, we exploit differences in the visibility and magnitude of solar eclipses during the Qing dynasty period. In the Confucian tradition, solar eclipses are considered a negative divine signal on the legitimacy of the ruler, facilitating the coordination of protest actions. We test this mechanism using detailed data on the timing and location of anti-government rebellions extracted from local chronicles. Counties within the totality zone of a solar eclipse were significantly more likely to experience a rebellion in the eclipse year. The persistent effect of past protests is stronger in counties with temples and memorials celebrating early anti-Qing leaders. Differences in historical memories of past protests affect communities’ reaction to current grievances against local governments. Communities with such memories are more likely to protest in response to higher levels of air pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Miao & Jacopo Ponticelli & Yi Shao, 2021. "Eclipses and the Memory of Revolutions: Evidence from China," NBER Working Papers 29182, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29182
    Note: CF DEV IFM POL
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w29182.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • N3 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.