IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/28810.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Were Small–Town New Yorkers Life–Cycle Savers?

Author

Listed:
  • Howard Bodenhorn

Abstract

Theories of household saving, including the life cycle hypothesis, posit that households add or draw down wealth to equalize the value of consumption over time. This article examines the extent to which late–nineteenth–century, small–town Americans accumulated financial assets consistent with the life cycle hypothesis. Using individual account records from a small–town savings banks, I find that savers accumulated an average of one year’s income at age sixty. Decumulation was slower than expected after age sixty. The evidence is inconsistent with a strong bequest motive, so the slow drawing down of wealth in old age may have been due to uncertain mortality risk or wealth–based attrition from the sample. I find differences in the life cycle accumulations between men and women, the native– and foreign–born, and low–skill and high–skill workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Howard Bodenhorn, 2021. "Were Small–Town New Yorkers Life–Cycle Savers?," NBER Working Papers 28810, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28810
    Note: DAE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w28810.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N21 - Economic History - - Financial Markets and Institutions - - - U.S.; Canada: Pre-1913

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.