IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/24134.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Value of Pharmacogenomic Information

Author

Listed:
  • John A. Graves
  • Shawn Garbett
  • Zilu Zhou
  • Josh Peterson

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics, or the application of genetic testing to guide drug selection and/or dosing, is often cited as integral to the vision of how precision medicine can be integrated into routine clinical practice. Yet despite a growing base of scientific discovery on genetic variation that predicts drug response, reimbursement for genetic testing among health systems and payers remains uneven. In large measure this is because the cascading impacts of genetic testing on individual and provider incentives and behavior, as well as downstream health care spending and outcomes, remain poorly understood. In this study, we couple evidence from a real-world implementation of pharmacogenomic testing with a discrete event simulation model. We use this framework to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various genetic testing strategies. We find that the cost-effectiveness of multiplexed genetic testing (e.g., whole genome sequencing) hinges on the ability of a health system to ensure that dense genotypic information is routinely utilized by physicians. Moreover, while much attention has been paid to lowering the cost of genetic tests, we demonstrate that in practice, other scientific and behavioral factors, focused on certain high-yield drug-gene pairs, are key to implementing precision medicine in ways that maximize its value.

Suggested Citation

  • John A. Graves & Shawn Garbett & Zilu Zhou & Josh Peterson, 2017. "The Value of Pharmacogenomic Information," NBER Working Papers 24134, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24134
    Note: EH
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w24134.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.