IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/1222.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic and Statistical Analysis of Discrimination in Hiring

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald G. Ehrenberg
  • Robert S. Smith

Abstract

Legal and administrative determinations of employers' compliance with "equal employment opportunity" (EEO) requirements often hinge on the issue of the availability of protected class members to employers. That is,courts and affirmative action review agencies compare the hire rates of protected class members (the ratio of the number of protected class members hired to the number who applied or who were potentially available) to the comparable ratio for other applicants, in assessing whether an employer's hiring policies meet the standards required of them by equal opportunity regulations. The purpose of this paper is to review what economic theory suggests affects availability and to analyze the extent to which these factors are considered in administrative or judicial decisions concerning hiring policies. In our analyses, we point out areas where there seem tobe inconsistencies or unresolved issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald G. Ehrenberg & Robert S. Smith, 1983. "Economic and Statistical Analysis of Discrimination in Hiring," NBER Working Papers 1222, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:1222
    Note: LS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w1222.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, Cléo, 2020. "How Economists Entered The ‘Numbers Game’: Measuring Discrimination In The Us Courtrooms, 1971–1989," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 229-259, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:1222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.