IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/c5dbfe946d7440838d9cc80a8c2ec59a.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Association Between Imposition of a Maintenance of Certification Requirement and Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Hospitalizations and Health Care Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Bradley M. Gray
  • Jonathan L. Vandergrift
  • Mary M. Johnston
  • James D. Reschovsky
  • Lorna A. Lynn
  • Eric S. Holmboe
  • Jeffrey S. McCullough
  • Rebecca S. Lipner

Abstract

In 1990, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) ended lifelong certification by initiating a 10-year Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program that first took effect in 2000.

Suggested Citation

  • Bradley M. Gray & Jonathan L. Vandergrift & Mary M. Johnston & James D. Reschovsky & Lorna A. Lynn & Eric S. Holmboe & Jeffrey S. McCullough & Rebecca S. Lipner, "undated". "Association Between Imposition of a Maintenance of Certification Requirement and Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Hospitalizations and Health Care Costs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c5dbfe946d7440838d9cc80a8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:c5dbfe946d7440838d9cc80a8c2ec59a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2020369
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sundmacher, Leonie & Fischbach, Diana & Schuettig, Wiebke & Naumann, Christoph & Augustin, Uta & Faisst, Cristina, 2015. "Which hospitalisations are ambulatory care-sensitive, to what degree, and how could the rates be reduced? Results of a group consensus study in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(11), pages 1415-1423.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Maintenance of Certification Requirement; Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Hospitalizations; Health Care Costs;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:c5dbfe946d7440838d9cc80a8c2ec59a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.