IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/7ba469baa340473e84253b7a02c46264.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Advancing Integrated Care for Dually Eligible Individuals: Factors Influencing State D-SNP Contracting Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Erin Weir Lakhmani
  • Danielle Chelminsky
  • Alena Tourtellotte
  • Alyssa Bosold
  • Debra Lipson
  • James Verdier

Abstract

With support from MACPAC, Mathematica studied state D-SNP contracting strategies aimed at integrating Medicare and Medicaid. A report and issue brief summarize key findings, including the importance of state context and resources; challenges in rural areas; and considering potential trade-offs and unintended consequences of some strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin Weir Lakhmani & Danielle Chelminsky & Alena Tourtellotte & Alyssa Bosold & Debra Lipson & James Verdier, "undated". "Advancing Integrated Care for Dually Eligible Individuals: Factors Influencing State D-SNP Contracting Decisions," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7ba469baa340473e84253b7a0, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:7ba469baa340473e84253b7a02c46264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/health/2021/d-snp-contracting-report_final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erin Weir Lakhmani & James Verdier, "undated". "State Options and Considerations for Sharing Medicaid Enrollment and Service Use Information with D-SNPs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c11b11c807eb41aaa7ba7c83f, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Dual eligible; dually eligible individuals; D-SNP; integrated care; Medicare; Medicaid;
      All these keywords.

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:7ba469baa340473e84253b7a02c46264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.