MCKERSIE, ROBERT B. EATON, SUSAN C. KOCHAN, THOMAS A.
Abstract
In 1997 Kaiser Permanente (KP) and a coalition of 26 local unions representing nearly 70,000 Kaiser employees created what is now the nation's largest and most ambitious labor-management partnership. In 2000, the parties faced the major challenge of negotiating their first labor agreement under the new Partnership. They designed and implemented what is also the largest and most complex interest-based negotiations (IBN) process carried out to date in the field of labor-management relations. We describe this case here, both to provide an historical account of the process and to explore the lessons that might be learned from how these parties addressed a series of generic challenges encountered when introducing IBN principles into collective bargaining
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management in its series Working papers with number
4312-03.
Length: Date of creation: 27 Jun 2003 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:mit:sloanp:3522
Contact details of provider: Postal: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MIT), SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT, 50 MEMORIAL DRIVE CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS 02142 USA Phone: 617-253-2659 Web page: http://mitsloan.mit.edu/ More information through EDIRC
Order Information: Postal: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MIT), SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT, 50 MEMORIAL DRIVE CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS 02142 USA
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christian Zimmermann).
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: