IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mil/wpdepa/2012-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The determinants of audit clients’ willingness to cooperate

Author

Listed:
  • Richard FONTAINE
  • Luciano PILOTTI

Abstract

The objective of this research is to determine what motivates clients to cooperate and to remain at arm’s length (independent) with their financial auditors. It was found that clients prefer a more relational approach (RA) than a transactional approach (TA) with their financial auditors (Fontaine and Pilote, 2011). More precisely, the audit client wants to cooperate with the auditor yet also wants to remain distant (at arms’ length). What is not known is what determines (causes) the client’s preference to cooperate and to remain at arm’s length. Investigating the determinants of the audit client’s willingness to cooperate is the center of on-going debates by audit academics and professionals. The problem is that an overly cooperative relationship has been considered a threat to auditor independence. We seek to determine what influenced the clients’ preference to be both cooperative and at arm’s length with their auditor. To achieve the objective of this research, we will rely on a new theoretical framework that is a modified version of a Relationship Marketing model, known as the Commitment-Trust model (Morgan and Hunt, 1994). The contribution of this study should extend beyond the accounting domain since the financial statement audit has important value to society. The financial audit has been referred to as a social phenomenon that exists because certain groups cannot obtain information or reassurance for themselves (Flint, 1988).

Suggested Citation

  • Richard FONTAINE & Luciano PILOTTI, 2012. "The determinants of audit clients’ willingness to cooperate," Departmental Working Papers 2012-02, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    • Handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2012-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wp.demm.unimi.it/files/wp/2012/DEMM-2012_002wp.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Paulin & R.J. Ferguson & Marielle Audrey Payaud, 2000. "Effectiveness of relational and transactional cultures in commercial banking : putting client-value into the competing values model," Post-Print halshs-00650008, HAL.
    2. Vivien Beattie & Stella Fearnley & Richard Brandt, 2001. "Behind Closed Doors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-59941-3.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ojo, Marianne, 2006. "The Role of External Auditors and International Accounting Bodies in Financial Regulation and Supervision," MPRA Paper 354, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jul 2006.
    2. Ahmed A. Elamer & Collins G. Ntim & Hussein A. Abdou & Alaa Mansour Zalata & Mohamed Elmagrhi, 2019. "The impact of multi-layer governance on bank risk disclosure in emerging markets: the case of Middle East and North Africa," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 246-281, April.
    3. Ojo, Marianne, 2009. "The role of external auditors in corporate governance: agency problems and the management of risk," MPRA Paper 28149, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Jan 2011.
    4. Beattie, Vivien, 2014. "Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 111-134.
    5. Ojo, Marianne, 2010. "BASEL III: responses to consultative documents, vital aspects of the consultative processes and the journey culminating in the present framework (Part 1)," MPRA Paper 32869, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2011.
    6. Christopher Humphrey, 2008. "Auditing research: a review across the disciplinary divide," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 170-203, February.
    7. Marianne, Ojo, 2013. "Sarbanes Oxley, Non Audit Services (NAS) and the mandatory rotation of audit firms," MPRA Paper 52073, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Dec 2013.
    8. Di Gabriele, James & Ojo, Marianne, 2013. "Objectivity and independence: the dual roles of external auditors and forensic accountants," MPRA Paper 44954, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Giuseppe Iuliano & Gaetano Matonti, 2015. "Do big 4 audit companies detect earnings management and report it in the audit opinion? Empirical evidence from italian non-listed firms," ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 5-43.
    10. Ojo, Marianne, 2005. "The External Auditor's Role in Bank Regulation and Supervision : Helping the Regulator Avoid Regulatory Capture," MPRA Paper 230, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jan 2006.
    11. Cooper, David J. & Robson, Keith, 2006. "Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 415-444.
    12. Ojo, Marianne, 2007. "The role of the external auditor in the regulation and supervision of the UK banking system," MPRA Paper 6830, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised May 2009.
    13. Marianne, Ojo, 2014. "Why integrity still constitutes the driving force behind ethical standards, the Sarbanes Oxley Act and other legislation," MPRA Paper 54644, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Peter Öhman & Einar Häckner & Dag Sörbom, 2012. "Client satisfaction and usefulness to external stakeholders from an audit client perspective," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 27(5), pages 477-499, May.
    15. Cédric Lesage & Soraya Bel Haj Ali, 2018. "Que disent les auditeurs quand ils ne sont plus silencieux? Le rôle des vertus face aux menaces contre l’éthique des auditeurs," Post-Print hal-01907972, HAL.
    16. Javier Montoya del Corte & Francisco Javier Martínez García & Ana Fernández Laviada, 2010. "Effective use of qualitative materiality factors: evidence from Spain," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(5), pages 458-483, May.
    17. Ojo, Marianne, 2010. "International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring: corporate governance and internal controls," MPRA Paper 21847, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Svanberg, Jan & Öhman, Peter & Neidermeyer, Presha E., 2019. "Auditor objectivity as a function of auditor negotiation self-efficacy beliefs," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 121-131.
    19. Ojo, Marianne, 2010. "BASEL III – Responses to consultative documents, vital aspects of the consultative processes and the journey culminating in the present framework," MPRA Paper 25975, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Mohammad Hudaib & T.E. Cooke, 2005. "The Impact of Managing Director Changes and Financial Distress on Audit Qualification and Auditor Switching," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(9‐10), pages 1703-1739, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2012-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: DEMM Working Papers (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damilit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.