Development evaluation and the European project
AbstractThe presentation focuses on the development evaluation experience and its relevance to investment planning in Europe. Both the development idea and the European project emerged out of the ashes of World War II when the victorious allies sought to turn swords into ploughshares. The new evaluation discipline that came into being at the same time embodied the ‘can do’ attitudes of policy makers who looked to the social sciences to generate the knowledge and the tools needed (i) to reconstruct the nations devastated by war; and (ii) to bring prosperity to the poverty stricken regions of the world. In these early years, cost benefit analysis admirably met the requirements of public investment planning since it embodied the prevailing model of economic recovery and growth that conceived of investment projects as the building blocks of national development plans. Development thinking has evolved considerably since this pioneering phase. The current consensus reflects three basic propositions: (i) macroeconomic as well as sector policies matter; (ii) the institutional context within which projects are embedded is critical to their success; and (iii) the interconnectedness of national economies has fundamental consequences for the design of development policies and programs. Given the Lisbon agenda, the very same considerations should inform the design of European Structural Funds programs. The methods used to design and evaluate the Structural Funds should give appropriate weight to the institutional and policy context of member countries in order to promote creativity and innovation in the European space. In particular, incentives should be crafted to encourage capacity building and policy adjustment. Only then will the Structural Funds contribute to the sound and efficient infrastructure investments that the enlarged Europe needs to remain competitive on the world stage
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano in its series Departmental Working Papers with number 2006-24.
Date of creation: 13 Oct 2006
Date of revision:
Evaluation; Economic Development; EU Structural Funds;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
- O12 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
- O22 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Project Analysis
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2006-10-28 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (DEMM Working Papers).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.