Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Are cap-and-trade programs more environmentally effective than conventional regulation?

Contents:

Author Info

  • A. Denny Ellerman
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Market-based instruments (MBI’s) are advocated because of their presumed lower economic cost in comparison with conventional regulatory instruments. The environmental effectiveness of the MBI is typically assumed to be the same as that of the conventional alternative (Crocker, 1966; Dales, 1968; Montgomery, 1972). Recent experience with cap-and-trade systems has confirmed the economic advantages of MBI’s (Ellerman et al., 2000; Carlson et al., 2000; Ellerman et al., 2003) and failed to find a degradation of environmental performance (Burtraw and Mansur, 1999; Swift, 2000). As a result, MBI’s, and especially cap-and-trade systems, have become widely accepted in the policy community. Recognizing this circumstance, opponents of the use of MBIs tend to attack the assumption that the environmental performance is equal (Clear the Air, 2002; Moore, 2002). Their argument is that, while the economic performance may be better, the environmental performance is worse, and that the increased environmental damages outweigh the savings in abatement cost.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://tisiphone.mit.edu/RePEc/mee/wpaper/2003-015.pdf
    Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 500 Can't connect to tisiphone.mit.edu:80 (10060). If this is indeed the case, please notify (Sharmila Ganguly)
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research in its series Working Papers with number 0315.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: Sep 2003
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:mee:wpaper:0315

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 77 Massachusetts Ave. (Building E40-279), Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
    Phone: (617) 253-3551
    Fax: (617) 253-9845
    Email:
    Web page: http://tisiphone.mit.edu/RePEc
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mee:wpaper:0315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sharmila Ganguly) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Sharmila Ganguly to update the entry or send us the correct address.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.