Should someone who is regarded as a good writer also be a clear writer, especially in subjects such as economics, philosophy and politics? This paper examines the interaction between certain of Keynes's characteristics as a writer and the clarity of his writings. Its central thesis is that lack of clarity in Keynes's writings is sometimes due to poor or careless use of language. That is to say, the underlying clarity of thought in his writings is obscured by poor word choice of laxity in the unemployment of language. To illustrate the thesis, three case studies are presented, involving passages for How to Pay for the War, the Treatise on Probability, and the General Theory.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Macquarie University, Department of Economics in its series Research Papers with number
0307.
Find related papers by JEL classification: A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals